The impact of AI on recruitment

January 24, 2024

Recruitment as a career is the epitome of the phrase “trying to find a needle in a haystack”. Economic fluctuations, demand in a particular sector, an overabundance of graduates with a particular qualification – all of these things and more can lead to some jobs having hundreds – or even thousands – of applicants rushing for a single position when it crops up.


With so many individuals competing for a dramatically smaller number of jobs, how do recruiters find ways to make their lives easier and their jobs more manageable? This is where artificial intelligence (AI) can play a role. In today’s article, we’ll take a look at the impact of AI on recruitment: its uses, pros, potential pitfalls and the future.


The use of AI in recruitment

First things first. AI stands for artificial intelligence. Put simply, this involves software being able to execute tasks that are usually carried out by humans. This includes – among other things – decision making, visual and vocal recognition, and translation.


Recruiters and agents have been using AI for years, and its origins were modest and relatively simple. For example, using an AI-powered Applicant Tracking System (ATS) to scan through hundreds of CVs and look for keywords or phrases is now fairly common. As such, AI technology presents a great way for recruiters to thin the herd quickly and efficiently.


The use of AI to quickly scan through CVs often leads to criticism from job seekers though. They argue that the technology reduces a person’s CV to a simple ‘yes or no’ purely based on a keyword search while that decision should be based on the quality of their experience and/or personality traits.

The problem, however, is that the alternative for recruiters is to read and evaluate every single CV separately. In the earlier example of a job position with thousands of applicants, this would take weeks – if not months. All while the applicants are eagerly waiting to hear back. With 52% of recruitment leaders saying that identifying the right candidates from a pool of applicants is the most challenging part of their job, it seems clear that the experts feel this isn’t a task that can be done with people power alone.


There are many – many – other examples of the use of AI in recruitment. Just to give you an idea: applications of AI can help with the sourcing, pre-selection and onboarding parts of your hiring process. Other tools can answer candidate questions and set up interviews. And the list goes on. We won’t be able to cover all of these technologies today but we will look at some of them.



The impact of AI on recruitment: the Pros of AI

Let’s take a look at some of the benefits that the use of AI in recruitment can bring:

#1. It saves time

Most recruiters are very busy people. In that regard, the more tedious, time-consuming tasks that can be automated, the better. The use of an AI-driven chatbot, for example, can remove heaps of these mundane tasks. Think of answering (simple) candidate questions, scheduling interviews and screening applicants for instance. Things that certainly are important and need to be done, but that can also easily be automated.

Alexander Mann Solutions is one of the companies that use AI-infused technology to automate processes such as scheduling interviews and sending out job offers. Mya doing her chatbot magic.


#2. It removes bias

When it comes to finding the perfect candidate for the job, the last thing we want is for our judgment to be clouded by bias. Fortunately, there are some interesting applications of AI in recruitment that can help reduce bias. There are tools out there to help recruiters write a bias-free job advert for example. Textio is probably one of the company’s that’s most-known for this so-called augmented writing technology.

AI-powered preselection software uses predictive analytics to calculate a candidate’s likelihood to succeed in a role. This allows recruiters and hiring managers to make data-driven hiring decisions rather than decisions based on their gut feeling. Pymetrics is an example of a company that’s active in this space.


#3. It finds candidates

AI-powered software can analyze people’s online presence such as their social media profiles and public data. The technology can make predictions based on this data. For example about how likely people are to accept a job and what roles they might be interested in. It can also analyze the profiles of candidates who have already started a job within the company. By combining all the available information, the software can identify candidates with similar personalities and skills. It can decipher which candidates might be interested in certain roles and directly target relevant job adverts at them. PandoLogic uses AI to make talent acquisition more efficient and effective.


#4. It improves the candidate experience

Let’s go back to that AI-infused chatbot we mentioned. It never takes a day off, which means it’s always ready to answer candidate questions. Even at midnight. Or on a Sunday afternoon. As such, it can guide the candidate through the recruitment process more efficiently; instant answers right when they need them. And this is just one example of how adding AI instruments to your recruitment process can improve the candidate experience.


The impact of AI on recruitment: Potential pitfalls

Sure, when used correctly, the use of AI-powered technology in recruitment can have tremendous benefits. However, there are potential pitfalls too.

Technology can use AI to detect certain subtleties in candidate behavior during a video interview for instance. But who’s to say that an applicant’s body language isn’t simply due to him or her being nervous rather than them cheating? Human qualities such as empathy and contextual understanding are still (almost) impossible to replace with software.


Another tricky situation. An AI-driven recruitment tool might identify a candidate as having all the necessary experience based on a keyword search. But will it miss the fact that the same candidate has changed jobs four times in one year?


An often heard fear is that of AI replacing humans, displacing many from their jobs. While there certainly will be an impact, it’s not as bad as many people seem to think. In most cases, AI and automation will only take over those repetitive, easy-to-automate tasks we mentioned. As such, this will enable us, humans, to focus on more interesting tasks.



What does the future hold?

Artificial intelligence is changing the recruitment industry. There are already some tremendous, AI-driven applications out there and their number is likely to go up (a lot). Whether you like it or not, if you don’t at least look into the possibilities of AI for your organization, you’ll be missing out. Not because it will replace the people in your company, but because it will free up their time to do more important things. Such as listening to and empathizing with candidates when they need to.


So try out some new tools, software, and programs to see what works for your organization. That way you can create an automated recruitment process that will eventually improve your quality of hire, your candidate experience and – perhaps most importantly – the everyday working lives of your recruiters.


Source:    https://www.aihr.com/blog/impact-ai-recruitment/


June 12, 2024
Middle managers are arguably the backbone of any organisation. But the job can be a tough one. Here’s how HR can help. Middle managers are working in increasingly hybrid workforces , often geographically dispersed and requiring more flexibility than ever before. Amid a cost-of-living crisis, social and political challenges , and the long-tail mental health impacts of the pandemic, employees are coming to work seeking support for personal issues from their managers. Middle managers are also expected to do more with less, such as boosting productivity in organisations battling employee shortages and wellbeing issues. It’s a lot to contend with on top of making it through their own workloads. The unrelenting pressure of working in middle management led Paul Farina towards unhealthy over-working habits . He spent a decade in the cosmetics and retail sectors in Australia and the UK, managing teams and clients across various time zones. Working around the clock was common. He would barely get home from a long day in the office when his boss would call, asking for a debrief from the day. Rather than speak up and admit it was too much, Farina handled the pressure by working harder and longer, and turned to alcohol to cope with the stress. “When you’re in middle management, you’ve always got a boss needing monthly and quarterly budgets to be hit, projects to be met by deadline and things to be completed within budget, and all that pressure gets funnelled down to you,” he says. “I needed to take those directives and deliver on them while simultaneously plugging gaps and vacancies, all the while toeing the company line even when things were less than perfect in the field.” This dynamic meant he was constantly looking for ways to appease others, often taking work off his team and doing it himself. “There’s an emotional side to working in middle management as well, which comes from this feeling of being emotionally isolated and not being able to share that with anyone. “You feel like you’re being held hostage by your staff as well because you don’t want to lose them, which leads to isolation. If I didn’t have a couple of buddies in the trenches with me that I could trust, I would have been in a lot of trouble. We’ve all got to pay the mortgage, and, at the time, I wasn’t in a situation to just up and quit.” Eventually, Farina did quit, navigating his way into a role where he now counsels others in middle management. Looking back, he admits he didn’t have the education or strategic thinking to deal with the pressure. “I had nothing in my toolkit at the time. I should have been more assertive, and I should have held senior staff coming at me with constant demands to account. I should have learned to say ‘no’. “I don’t recall saying ‘no’ to anything or anyone, which means I was constantly appeasing staff and external stakeholders.” He believes the pressure on middle managers was amplified during the pandemic years. “Budgets are down and organisational hierarchies have become even flatter. Middle managers are carrying a lot of that load. “When you get under the hood, most organisations have a lot fewer people in them than you might assume.” Middle managers are feeling the strain on their mental health The complex work of middle management is all taking a toll on this cohort’s mental health . Not surprisingly, more than half of middle managers (53 per cent) are feeling stressed or burned out and 46 per cent are experiencing anxiety, according to the Indeed 2023 Workplace Wellbeing Report . Middle managers also feel neglected and lack essential leadership, communication and people management skills, found research by the Australian Institute of Management and Monash University. It indicated that middle managers are therefore significantly underperforming despite their key role in corporate ranks. But this doesn’t necessarily reflect a lack of capability. Many haven’t been adequately trained to deal with these added pressures, or don’t have the bandwidth to respond appropriately to the competing pressures put upon them. “We need to acknowledge that individual contributors promoted to middle management don’t come automatically equipped with the management skills needed to thrive in their role.” – Kade Brown, Workforce Solutions Director, RMIT Online Reducing friction points for managers Bolstering middle managers’ capabilities needs to be a key priority for organisations. Effective middle managers are able to reduce friction points at work, accelerate action and help an organisation work towards its goals. The challenge of balancing the fiscal needs of a business, managing cost and maximising profits means there is a huge under-investment in leadership capabilities, says Lorraine Farah FCPHR, Director of Leaning Forward. She wants to see organisations drag middle managers out of the weeds of work where they are often overworked and under-resourced. “Senior leaders underestimate the impact their [managers] have throughout their organisation,” she says. “The shadow they cast by the behaviours they demonstrate impacts not only engagement, but, importantly, all aspects of delivery of the business outcomes.” Coupled with this, managers and leaders often deprioritise development and training in their already over-committed roles and seem unwilling to find time to upskill, she says. As well as time constraints, she lists three main issues holding middle managers back from utilising their full potential: A lack of commitment from leaders to prioritise managers’ development as a core capability. Structurally, the span of control of middle managers often sees them stretched too thin. They have too many direct reports, combined with complex processes, leaving them burnt out just trying to get the job done. Managers aren’t usually rewarded for being a good manager. It may be acknowledged, yet it’s not always encouraged nor rewarded in a way that delivering on business results is. Managers will focus on what is measured and rewarded, and make choices on which work to prioritise when pressed for time. Farah wants to see commitment at an executive level to consistent, non-negotiable leadership development for middle managers. For example, providing access to leadership development topics right in the moments they need it most – such as how to conduct performance reviews, manage conflict , create space for innovation, seek and provide feedback , etc., in addition to established leadership programs. This just-in-time training approach helps keep learning highly relevant for middle managers, so they are able to bake it into their workflow rather than viewing their upskilling as separate to their work or as an addition to their to-do list. Research from McKinsey & Company shows that companies that invest in their human capital yield more consistent earnings through times of crisis. In fact, organisations with effective middle managers in the top quartile produced up to 21 times greater total shareholder returns than others in lower quartiles, according to 11 measured management practices used to define an organisation’s health. “The correlation between trust and the relationship between employees and their direct manager is strong and leads to better outcomes,” says Farah. How technological development will impact middle managers While the role of middle managers will continue to evolve with technological advances, it’s unlikely the layer will disappear entirely, says executive coach Smita Das Jain. However, the specific responsibilities of middle managers will evolve alongside the adoption of technology as routine tasks and administrative duties are automated . “Organisations [should] stop and take stock, and adopt technology to automate many of the tasks middle managers perform, such as training, employee performance, generating reports and making decisions,” says Jain. This frees up time for middle managers to focus on higher-level strategic planning and decision-making, she says. Rethinking traditional managerial roles As organisations shift and become more complex, middle managers may become more vital than ever, says Murat Tarakci, Professor of Innovation Strategy at the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University. He cites findings that attribute 22 to 30 per cent gains in productivity and innovation to effective middle management. In a separate academic paper he recently published, he illustrates the challenges middle managers face by quoting one middle manager at phone company Nokia admitting: “We knew the iPhone was coming out about a year in advance. We had pretty good specifications for it. The CEO forwarded the email to his subordinates, writing ‘Please take action on this’. Yet, middle managers folded, and opted to sugar-coat the stalled process, causing Nokia to lose the competitive battle for smartphones.” “Middle managers are constantly coping with, adapting to, or even resisting contradictory demands and pressures,” says Tarakci in his paper. “As new technologies emerge, rivals flood one’s turf and customer preferences reposition… these shifts require rapid and effective organisational responses to adapt to an ever-changing environment,” says Tarakci. While changes in the business landscape often necessitate extra support for middle managers, the simple elements of work can also create friction points. For example, an excessive number of direct reports can overwhelm managers, hindering their ability to provide adequate coaching and guidance, says Kade Brown, Workforce Solutions Director at RMIT Online. “Conversely, too few direct reports may indicate inefficiencies or questionable promotions, leading to underutilisation of managerial talent,” he says. Empowering managers to focus on the right tasks is critical, he says. This involves identifying and streamlining low-value bureaucratic activities, leveraging automation and outsourcing where applicable. “By reducing administrative burdens, middle managers can allocate more time and energy towards fostering a supportive environment, nurturing talent and addressing the needs of their teams,” says Brown. “We need to acknowledge that individual contributors promoted to middle management don’t come automatically equipped with the management skills needed to thrive in their role. They require intentional and targeted upskilling in three key areas: business acumen, structured problem-solving and people leadership.” As such, middle manager upskilling initiatives shouldn’t focus just on theory, but on embedded practice and behaviour change. “It’s imperative to design or procure upskilling solutions that enable managers to integrate new skills seamlessly into their current world of work,” says Brown. This strategic realignment enables managers to focus on driving impact and promoting a culture of engagement and growth within the organisation. “The pace of change, disruption and transformation in the world of work isn’t going to decelerate any time soon,” says Brown. To alleviate the cognitive load on middle managers, the best thing we can do is to equip them with the tools and skills they need to cope with this new reality. This article was first published in the April/May 2024 edition of HRM Magazine. Source: https://www.hrmonline.com.au/culture-leadership/how-can-organisations-support-middle-managers/
June 12, 2024
Introduction: What Is Executive Coaching? Executive coaching is a development process that involves a series of one-on-one interactions between a coach and a client , who is typically a manager or executive in an organization. The goal of executive coaching is to equip individuals with the knowledge and opportunities they need to develop themselves and improve their performance. Executive coaches work with clients to understand their current competencies , see how they’re perceived by others, and focus on identifying and clarifying current goals as well as the appropriate action steps. They provide a safe, structured, and trustworthy environment in which to offer support for the individual. Executive coaching is action-based , focusing on altering a client’s thinking and encouraging tangible work and behavior changes. It can be used at any stage of a leader or manager’s career to help maximize their potential . The process typically involves assessment, feedback and development, and planning and implementation stages . It can help improve a variety of areas, including time management, identifying priorities, driving strategy, maximizing critical thinking, and defining a powerful vision for the business . In Ontology of Value, we offer executive coaching and we believe that working with us will bring you hundredfold returns! Types of Executive Coaching. Executive coaching services come in various forms, each designed to address specific needs and situations. Here are some of the main types: Performance Coaching Services: This traditional form of coaching is often brought in by senior managers and HR to enhance the performance of individuals or teams. Executive Coaching Services: This type of coaching is specifically for top management, such as CEOs, CFOs, and Presidents . It focuses on updating their skillsets in specific areas that can have a long-term impact on the organization. Leadership Coaching Services: Leadership coaches work with individuals to improve their ability to lead and manage others effectively . Career Coaching Services: Career coaches help individuals identify their passions, strengths, and limitations , and then map out a strategy for a successful career change or advancement. First 100-Days Coaching Services: This type of coaching is designed to support leaders in their first 100 days in a new role , helping them to navigate the transition and establish effective leadership practices. Small Group Coaching Services: This form of coaching involves working with small groups to enhance team performance and dynamics. Large Group Coaching Services: Large group coaching is used to address issues and enhance performance at a larger scale within the organization . Strategic Coaching Services: Strategic coaches work with top executives in defining the long-term direction and putting together a long-term strategic plan . Therapeutic/Emotionally Curative Coaching Services: This type of coaching focuses on addressing emotional challenges that may be impacting an executive’s performance. Integrated Coaching Services: Integrated coaching embeds coaching sessions into a leadership development program , reaffirming and reinforcing lessons learned in leadership training. Team Coaching Services: Team coaching focuses on improving the performance and dynamics of a team within the organization. Virtual Coaching Services: Virtual coaching is conducted online , providing flexibility and accessibility for the coachee. Each type of executive coaching has its unique benefits and is used based on the specific needs and goals of the individual or team. How To Find an Excellent Executive Coach? Don’t look at the pricing but at the experience and testimonials. Finding an excellent executive coach involves several steps and considerations. Here are some key points to guide you through the process: Understand the Coach’s Niche and Area of Expertise: It’s important to ensure that the coach has expertise in your industry and understands the unique challenges you face . A coach who specializes in your field will be more equipped to provide relevant advice and strategies. Check the Coach’s Experience and Credentials: Look at the coach’s background , their coaching experience, and their success stories. Check their credentials and whether they have kept their knowledge up to date. Consider the Coach’s Approach and Style: Every coach has a unique style and approach to coaching . Some may be more directive, providing specific advice and strategies, while others may be more facilitative, helping you to find your own solutions. It’s important to find a coach whose style aligns with your needs and preferences. Look for Key Qualities: Good executive coaches possess certain qualities such as emotional intelligence, excellent communication skills, professionalism, and a personalized approach . They should be good listeners, able to provide constructive feedback, and committed to helping you achieve your goals. Ask for Recommendations: You can ask your trusted colleagues and peers for recommendations . They may have worked with a coach in the past and can provide valuable insights. Schedule a Chemistry Session: Before deciding on a coach, it’s a good idea to have a “chemistry session” or initial consultation . This will give you a chance to see if you feel comfortable with the coach and if their approach aligns with your needs. Check for Accreditation: Ensure the coach is accredited by a recognized body . This ensures they have met certain standards of competence and professionalism. Consider the Coach’s Commitment to Continuous Learning: The best coaches are those who are committed to their own continuous learning and development . They stay on top of the latest trends and best practices in their field. Evaluate the Coach’s Success Stories: L ook at the coach’s past success stories and testimonials . This can give you an idea of their effectiveness and the results they have helped others achieve. Ensure Confidentiality: Confidentiality is crucial in a coaching relationship . Make sure the coach has a clear confidentiality policy. Remember, the best coach for you is one who understands your unique needs, challenges, and goals , and who can provide the support and guidance you need to achieve them. Examples of Famous People Who Work With Executive Coaches. Several famous individuals across various fields have worked with executive coaches to enhance their skills, leadership abilities, and overall performance. Here are some examples: Eric Schmidt, Former Google CEO, was coached by Bill Campbell . Bill Gates, Founder of Microsoft, also received coaching from Bill Campbell . Oprah Winfrey, renowned media executive and talk show host, has employed the help of a coach . Richard Branson, Founder of Virgin Group, was coached by Mark C. Thompson . Bill Clinton, Former US President, was coached by Anthony Robbins . Brian C. Cornell, CEO of Target Corp., was coached by Marshall Goldsmith . Marc Benioff, Founder & CEO of Salesforce, has also worked with an executive coach . Steve Jobs, Co-founder and CEO of Apple, had a coach during his tenure . Sheryl Sandberg, COO of Facebook, has had business coaching . Jeff Bezos, Founder of Amazon, has also worked with a coach . Barack Obama, Former US President, worked with John Mattone, one of the top executive coaches in the world . These individuals recognized the value of executive coaching services in their personal and professional development, demonstrating that even those at the top of their fields can benefit from the guidance and insight provided by a skilled coach. Source: https://ontologyofvalue.com/unlocking-leadership-excellence-the-power-of-executive-coaching-2/
Share by: